Summary of Rainbow v Howkins case

Spread the love

Rainbow v Howkins

Summary of Facts/ Principle: It tells against the plaintiffs but again it is distinguishable, because the action was brought on the ground that the auctioneer was personally liable as if he were vendor under a contract of sale not upon a collateral contract, and alternatively for breach of warranty of authority.

Judgment: It was held that he could not be sued on the first ground because of the statute, and could not be sued for breach of warranty of authority, because there was none since, apart from the statute, he had effectively bound the vendor

Hey There, you’re welcome once again to (short for Answer my Questions) blog, you can type the name of any case you’re looking for in the search box below or above as we’ve made summary of many cases available. have a nice time.


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 ÷ = 2