Summary Fitch v. Snedaker Case

Spread the love

Fitch v. Snedaker

There was a reward for whoever gave information leading to the arrest of certain killers. The plaintiff gave the information before the reward was offered and still claimed entitlement of the rewards. It was held there was no mutual assent hence no contract had been formed. How can there be consent to that which the party has never heard? It was held that an offer cannot become a contract unless it was acted upon or assented to. There can be no acceptance in ignorance of offer.

Hey there, you’re welcome once again to (short for Answer my Questions) blog, you can type the name of any case you’re looking for in the search box below or above as we’ve made summary of many cases available. have a nice time

See also  Summary of Nigeria National Supply Company (NNSC) v. Agricor Incorporation of USA

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+ 6 = 13