SUMMARY OF R v Aniogo

Spread the love

R v Aniogo

 The prosecution conceded to reduction of the sentence to manslaughter and there was also the evidence that the accused there thought the deceased was “possibly armed” when he shot him. Therefore, the verdict of manslaughter was not inconsistent with other decisions of the court.

 

Hey there, you’re welcome once again to Ansmyques.com (short for Answer my Questions) blog, you can type the name of any case you’re looking for in the search box below or above as we’ve made summary of many cases available. have a nice time.

See also  SUMMARY OF GADAM V. THE QUEENT

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

72 ÷ = 12