Summary of Tinn v. Hoffman

Spread the love

Tinn v. Hoffman

The plaintiff and defendant both wrote letters to each other offering to buy and sell at 800 tons per shilling. It was held that there was no contract and there were just two simultaneous offers. There was an absence of consensus ad idem, that is meeting of the minds.

Hey there, you’re welcome once again to (short for Answer my Questions) blog, you can type the name of any case you’re looking for in the search box below or above as we’ve made summary of many cases available. have a nice time

See also  Nwosu v Imo State Environmental Sanitation Authority

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

48 − 46 =